Sales were solid but unspectacular at first, steady within book clubs and academic circles, enough to matter but not enough to shake any corporate boardrooms or fracture expensive glass offices.
Then came the detonation.
A sharp eyed Forbes investigative reporter read the novel on a long flight and felt an uneasy tug at the particularity of its details and timeline.
She matched the novel’s chronology with news about the Apex Dynamics CEO’s divorce, noticing how Zeith Corporation’s headquarters mirrored Apex’s building, and how the triplets resembled a gossip column item about Mark’s family.
She started digging, assembling a meticulous comparison between the book’s plot and publicly available information about Mark Vape, then published a bombshell article titled “Fiction or Exposé? Triplets, the Mistress, and the Scarecrow Wife.”
The effect was instant and explosive.
Within seventy two hours, the novel rocketed to the top of The New York Times bestseller list, propelled not only by literary merit but by insatiable public hunger for scandalous truth.
People were not just buying a story; they were buying front row seats to the slow motion destruction of a powerful man who embodied everything rotten in corporate America.
The “Scarecrow Wife” narrative seized the public imagination.
Mark became a national symbol of narcissistic male entitlement, corporate cruelty, and the way powerful men treat women’s bodies as disposable packaging for their egos.
Social media erupted.
Millions of posts, memes, and hashtags flooded every platform.
#ScarecrowWife and #DropTheCEO trended for days as readers dissected scenes and compared them to real headlines.
TikTok creators staged elaborate dramatic reenactments of key moments from the book, podcasts dedicated entire episodes to analyzing Victor Stope’s sociopathic traits, and professors added the novel to ethics and gender studies syllabi.
Mainstream media shows debated whether the book was vengeance or justice, whether it violated privacy or illuminated systemic rot, whether fiction could be morally necessary in the face of real world cruelty.
Business shows dissected Zeith’s collapse as a cautionary tale; feminist writers celebrated the book as a landmark example of a woman reclaiming her narrative and weaponizing story against structural abuse.
The commercial fallout for Apex Dynamics was immediate and brutal.
Clients quietly withdrew contracts, unwilling to be associated with a company whose CEO was labeled a monster on national television and dissected in viral threads.
The carefully crafted image of Apex as an innovative, forward thinking tech leader was replaced overnight by a new association: cruelty, misogyny, and a corporate culture rotting from the top down.
The stock price, already volatile from market conditions, entered a terrifying free fall over three trading days, erasing billions in market capitalization as institutional investors fled the risk.
At first, Mark reportedly laughed, dismissing the uproar as a passing storm and clinging to the outdated idea that all publicity, even bad, could somehow be spun into opportunity.
He granted an ill advised CNBC interview where he smirked and dismissed the book as “fiction from a bitter ex wife with too much time,” radiating arrogance and zero empathy.
That clip went viral for all the wrong reasons.
His smug smile, contemptuous tone, and refusal to acknowledge harm confirmed exactly what the novel had portrayed; outrage intensified, boycotts spread, advertisers stepped away from Apex sponsored events.
As the magnitude of the disaster finally sank in, Mark panicked.
He screamed at his legal team to sue the publisher, the anonymous author, every outlet covering the story, anyone he imagined might bend under financial pressure.
His lawyers patiently explained that the book was labeled fiction with altered details, that truth is an absolute defense against defamation, and that proving harm without admitting conduct would be nearly impossible.
Meanwhile, regulators and investigative journalists noticed that the financial irregularities described in the novel—creative accounting, suspicious trades, misuse of corporate resources—mapped disturbingly well onto rumors already whispering through Wall Street.
The SEC opened a formal investigation.
The FBI’s white collar crime division quietly requested documents.
Suddenly, scenes I had written for narrative drama became roadmaps for federal inquiries.
Apex’s board of directors convened an emergency closed door meeting, watching shareholder value evaporate and reading analysis after analysis insisting the company could not recover with Mark still at the helm.
When Mark tried to enter the boardroom to defend himself, the security guards he had personally hired blocked his path and asked him to wait outside.
The vice chairman delivered the verdict through a speakerphone, voice cold and devoid of sympathy, explaining that his documented behavior, real or fictional, represented an unacceptable risk to shareholder value.
“The market does not distinguish between truth and effective narrative,” the vice chairman said.
“It responds only to perception and risk.
You are now pure toxicity.
The decision is unanimous.
You are terminated for cause, effective immediately.”
Security escorted Mark out of the building with his belongings in a cardboard box, stripped of his title, his office, his access, and his seven figure salary in one humiliating afternoon.
Chloe was fired hours later for policy violations and reputational risk, discovering that the corporate world she had helped weaponize against me had absolutely no loyalty to her either.
Desperate to stanch the bleeding, the board issued public statements condemning Mark’s behavior, promising culture reforms, and signaling a complete leadership overhaul in hopes of stabilizing the shattered brand.
Meanwhile, my phone rang constantly as my lawyers negotiated.
The board wanted to preempt any potential lawsuits from me and, more importantly, prevent a sequel or damaging interviews from further igniting public fury.
They offered a generous settlement in exchange for my agreement not to reveal anything beyond what was already public, hoping money might buy a little narrative peace.
I did not need their money—the book alone had earned more than I ever expected—but I accepted on principle, recognizing it as a formal acknowledgment of what I had endured.
My final act of poetic justice was small, elegant, and perfect.
See more on the next page
Advertisement
